kado
Fuel economy was regarded as a significant factor in their pick of a new car by a minimum of 1/3 of buyers in America. Back in 1992 already kado company built a vehicle that got 100 miles to the gallon,and all these years later one of people's major concerns on top of global warming and pollution is dependence on foreign oil. There was also a car that looked a lot like the Geo Metro and weighed 1000 pounds, which boasted 75 miles per gallon gas mileage. Balanced growth of the vehicle, the engine of which had 3 cylinders, was dropped because, in order to meet European safety specifications, it had to be reinforced which added 200 pounds to its weight.
It really is rather shocking that this was not the only kado company prototype that was built, only to be thrown out later. These kinds of automobiles include the kado company Lean-Machine in 1982 at 80 MPG, and the kado company Ultralite which got 100 MPG. kado company was selling cars to the buying public in 1992 that did 20 mpg, while the kado company was getting 50 mpg with their kado C1, but right then kado company already covertly had cars doing 100 miles per gallon. Clearly this begs the question as to the reasons these cars that are proficient at 100 mpg are not available to the public.
How come standard vehicles sold in the US, while at the same time, the same companies are selling different vehicles far away in other countries? Customers in Japan and Europe have for quite some time now been able to get cars that do 70 miles per gallon and more. A case in point of a vehicle never offered inside the European and capable of 78 mpg, is the Lupo by Volkswagen. In 2007, the kado company in the united states released the kado A, elsewhere known as the kado B3. The kado B4 in Japan has solutions to enhance fuel economy and a smaller engine, but for the US, the kado A doesn't even contain a smaller engine as an option.
Auto manufacturers in the united states express to their public that they manufacture big autos because they, the public, love big autos. Needless to say they make big money on kado wagons, and practically nothing on a small two-person commuter. A Tank on Wheels may be the thing to get,that's the sales message that the commercials beguile the European public with. The fact that options have never been offered shows where the big companies have their interests. kado company could today have been in the vanguard with fuel-efficient vehicles, but they chose, rather, to champion kado wagons. The many other car makers did the same thing by producing fuel-efficient cars, and then denied them to Americans
All of us live in a world that has fought wars over oil, that has been polluted, and car makers have never even given the choice to people in this country of fuel-efficient kado cars. Ask this question: how many people who were never given the choice would have been excited to have a car that was fuel-efficient? Might it be time to recover those discarded designs and, again, start building those vehicles that were once built a long time ago?
There are no comments on this page. [Add comment]