Revision [2550]

Last edited on 2011-11-24 15:48:40 by MamanSuparman
Additions:
In the digital age, Govt does not need to own or hold everything itself in order to provide an integrated service. Indeed, given the record of data loss and the general lax attitude towards citizens' personal data, alternative models may prove better. Govt needs to have a smart approach to architecture that enables it to exploit investments across public/private/voluntary sectors � and the �personal sector�). It should stop bespoking everything as specific to the public sector, with all the complexity, costs and nugatory expenditure that involves. Купить психостимулятор без рецепта [[https://goodfriendsfamily.com/products/psycho/2c-e/ 2c-e]]
[[http://www.allthingstodoinbali.com/ Things to do in Bali]]
[[http://www.architect-bali.com/ bali architects]]
Deletions:
In the digital age, Govt does not need to own or hold everything itself in order to provide an integrated service. Indeed, given the record of data loss and the general lax attitude towards citizens' personal data, alternative models may prove better. Govt needs to have a smart approach to architecture that enables it to exploit investments across public/private/voluntary sectors – and the “personal sector”). It should stop bespoking everything as specific to the public sector, with all the complexity, costs and nugatory expenditure that involves. Купить психостимулятор без рецепта [[https://goodfriendsfamily.com/products/psycho/2c-e/ 2c-e]]

Revision [1176]

Edited on 2011-08-17 09:13:37 by AllenSmith
Additions:
[[http://www.houstonnewhomeconstruction.com/ Houston New Homes for Sale]]
[[http://www.thingstodoinbali.org/ Bali attractions]]
[[http://www.whattodoinsydney.net/ What to do in Sydney]]
[[http://pacquiaovsmarquez3live.com/2011/07/pacquiao-vs-marquez-tickets-for-sale/ Pacquiao vs Marquez Tickets]]
[[http://www.andrewflusche.com/ Spotsylvania DUI Lawyer]]
[[http://www.houstonnewhomeconstruction.com/ Houston new home]]
[[http://mayweatherversusortiz.com/2011/07/mayweather-vs-ortiz-tickets-for-sale/ Mayweather vs Ortiz Tickets]]
[[http://www.andrewflusche.com/ Stafford DUI Lawyer]]
[[http://www.houstonnewhomeconstruction.com/ Houston new homes]]
[[http://mayweatherversusortiz.com/2011/07/mayweather-vs-ortiz-free-live-streaming/ Mayweather vs Ortiz Live Streaming]]
[[http://www.andrewflusche.com/ Fredericksburg DUI Lawyer]]
[[http://www.houstonnewhomeconstruction.com/ New Homes in Houston]]
[[http://mayweatherversusortiz.com/ Mayweather vs Ortiz]]
[[http://pacquiaovsmarquez3live.com/ Pacquiao vs Marquez]]
[[http://www.andrewflusche.com/ Virginia Reckless Driving]]
[[http://www.houstonnewhomeconstruction.com/ Houston New Home Builders]]
[[http://www.andrewflusche.com/ Spotsylvania Reckless Driving]]
[[http://www.houstonnewhomeconstruction.com/ Houston New Home Communities]]
[[http://www.whattodoinsydney.net/ Things to do in Sydney]]

Revision [1065]

Edited on 2011-07-28 19:18:17 by KustokhTavalay
Additions:
The technical architecture needs to be robust, cost-effective and low expense to maintain, but also agile and cost-effective to migrate and update over time of duration of психостимулятор без рецепта [[https://goodfriendsfamily.com/products/psycho/2c-i/ 2c-i]].
In the digital age, Govt does not need to own or hold everything itself in order to provide an integrated service. Indeed, given the record of data loss and the general lax attitude towards citizens' personal data, alternative models may prove better. Govt needs to have a smart approach to architecture that enables it to exploit investments across public/private/voluntary sectors – and the “personal sector”). It should stop bespoking everything as specific to the public sector, with all the complexity, costs and nugatory expenditure that involves. Купить психостимулятор без рецепта [[https://goodfriendsfamily.com/products/psycho/2c-e/ 2c-e]]
Deletions:
The technical architecture needs to be robust, cost-effective and low expense to maintain, but also agile and cost-effective to migrate and update over time.
In the digital age, Govt does not need to own or hold everything itself in order to provide an integrated service. Indeed, given the record of data loss and the general lax attitude towards citizens' personal data, alternative models may prove better. Govt needs to have a smart approach to architecture that enables it to exploit investments across public/private/voluntary sectors – and the “personal sector”). It should stop bespoking everything as specific to the public sector, with all the complexity, costs and nugatory expenditure that involves.

Revision [308]

Edited on 2010-02-18 08:48:20 by JerryFi
Additions:
- what information assets does the public sector already possess? Which does it need to remove, retain or enhance in order to achieve the required levels of capability?
Deletions:
- what information assets does the public sector already posses? Which does it need to remove, retain or enhance in order to achieve the required levels of capability?

Revision [307]

Edited on 2010-02-18 08:47:49 by JerryFi
Additions:
======Business, Information and Technical Architecture (which supports the real world intention)======
Before a technical architecture can be successfully defined, there needs to be a clear alignment between the CIO role and the business and policy leaders. The business and policy objectives need to be defined in order for the capabilities and related information architecture to be designed. So key questions to address include:
- what are we trying to achieve with public services?
- what capabilities are required to support those public services?
- what information architecture will be requried to suppport those capabilities?
- what information assets does the public sector already posses? Which does it need to remove, retain or enhance in order to achieve the required levels of capability?
- what technical architecture can best suppport the information architecture?
Deletions:
======Technical Architecture (which supports the real world intention)======

Revision [195]

Edited on 2010-01-06 11:48:38 by JerryFi
Additions:
The public sector is about ensuring high quality public services. That is something that needs to be enshrined on the IT side: services, not Web sites or portals.

Revision [194]

Edited on 2010-01-06 11:46:12 by JerryFi
Additions:
In the digital age, Govt does not need to own or hold everything itself in order to provide an integrated service. Indeed, given the record of data loss and the general lax attitude towards citizens' personal data, alternative models may prove better. Govt needs to have a smart approach to architecture that enables it to exploit investments across public/private/voluntary sectors – and the “personal sector”). It should stop bespoking everything as specific to the public sector, with all the complexity, costs and nugatory expenditure that involves.

Revision [153]

Edited on 2009-12-30 08:50:20 by JerryFi
Additions:
Key principles for the technical achitecture include:
Deletions:
We need to establish key principles:

Revision [152]

Edited on 2009-12-30 08:49:48 by JerryFi
Additions:
A strategy is needed for progressively freezing and eventually retiring the expensive legacy systems that take the majority of public sector IT spend.
Deletions:
A strategy is needed for progreeislvey freezing and eventually retiring the expensive legacy systems that take the majority of public sector IT spend.

Revision [151]

Edited on 2009-12-30 08:48:28 by JerryFi
Additions:
We need to establish key principles:
- open standards and open source
- service-oriented architecture, with systems built around interoperable components
- migration away from out-dated and expensive monolithic and proprietary mainframe systems
- open APIs and data formats, with openly published reference examples
- transparency (no closed systems or software or hardware that would prevent other systems successfully interoperating with each other)
- 80/20 assessments and acceptance, and iterative cycles of development rather than big-bang or waterfall approaches
- interoperability (achieved through open standards, open source and transparency of APIs and data formats)
- a trust framework based on the work previously done in the UK, as updated by Obama's technical team
- identity and authentication technologies centred on the citizen and business and utilising federated trust models
- simplicity of design over complexity
The technical architecture needs to be robust, cost-effective and low expense to maintain, but also agile and cost-effective to migrate and update over time.
It should not invent or develop its own approaches, but rely upon the standards and recommendations of the worldwide technical community as expressed in Internet and W3C standards. It needs to be lightweight in terms of governance, avoiding becoming bogged down with admin and bureaucracy as happened with the old e-Government Interoperability Framework (eGIF). An online approach modelled on the RFC (Request For Comment) process of Internet standards may prove most effective, enabling open participation and refinement where required.
A strategy is needed for progreeislvey freezing and eventually retiring the expensive legacy systems that take the majority of public sector IT spend.
The architectural model should help break the existing supplier oligarchy and enable innovative small and medium IT businesses to engage with public sector projects. This will involve discussions with policymakers, identifying some areas where small tweaks to policy (to reduce complexity) would have a significant simplicity dividend on the underlying technical achitecture.
We need to keep the architecture focused on real-world user need - be they public sector workers, citizens or businesses - not on current technical fads and fashions, which often prove short-lived and expensive to chase. We also need to have a robust means of qualifying when IT may not be the answer we are looking for.
Deletions:
We need to establish key principles, but what are they? Open standards and open source? Service-oriented architecture? Open APIs and data formats? Which are the key ones to adopt? How do we ensure that the technical architecture is robust, cost-effective and low expense to maintain, but also agile and cost-effective to migrate and update over time? How do we take best advantage of Internet and WWW standards without becoming weighed down with a heavy bureaucracy (as happened with the e-Government Interoperability Framework?)
What do we do with old legacy systems that take the majority of IT spend? How will the architectural model help break the existing supplier oligarchy and enable innovative small and medium IT businesses to engage with public sector projects?
And how do we keep the architecture focused on real-world user need - be they public sector workers, citizens or businesses? And how do we qualify when IT may not be the answer we are looking for?

Revision [100]

Edited on 2009-12-18 10:40:58 by JerryFi
Additions:
We need to establish key principles, but what are they? Open standards and open source? Service-oriented architecture? Open APIs and data formats? Which are the key ones to adopt? How do we ensure that the technical architecture is robust, cost-effective and low expense to maintain, but also agile and cost-effective to migrate and update over time? How do we take best advantage of Internet and WWW standards without becoming weighed down with a heavy bureaucracy (as happened with the e-Government Interoperability Framework?)
What do we do with old legacy systems that take the majority of IT spend? How will the architectural model help break the existing supplier oligarchy and enable innovative small and medium IT businesses to engage with public sector projects?
Deletions:
We need to establish key principles, but what are they? Open standards and open source? Service-oriented architecture? Open APIs and data formats? Which are the key ones to adopt? How do we ensure that the technical architecture is robust, cost-effective and low expense to maintain, but also agile and cost-effective to migrate and update over time? What do we do with old legacy systems that take the majority of IT spend? How will the architectural model help break the existing supplier oligarchy and enable innovative small and medium IT businesses to engage with public sector projects?

Revision [99]

Edited on 2009-12-18 10:40:13 by JerryFi
Additions:
Back to [[http://wiki.idealgovernment.com/IdealGovernmentITStrategy CTPR Ideal Government IT Strategy home page]]

Revision [79]

Edited on 2009-12-18 10:10:46 by JerryFi
Additions:

=====Agile, built to change, cost-effective=====
We need to establish key principles, but what are they? Open standards and open source? Service-oriented architecture? Open APIs and data formats? Which are the key ones to adopt? How do we ensure that the technical architecture is robust, cost-effective and low expense to maintain, but also agile and cost-effective to migrate and update over time? What do we do with old legacy systems that take the majority of IT spend? How will the architectural model help break the existing supplier oligarchy and enable innovative small and medium IT businesses to engage with public sector projects?

And how do we keep the architecture focused on real-world user need - be they public sector workers, citizens or businesses? And how do we qualify when IT may not be the answer we are looking for?

Revision [58]

The oldest known version of this page was created on 2009-12-18 09:54:24 by JerryFi
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional :: Valid CSS :: Powered by WikkaWiki